Shortly after the DOJ filed its intent to appeal, a gaming industry trade group issued a statement urging the government to reconsider.<\/p>\n
A group called IDEA Growth, founded by noted gaming attorney Jeff Ifrah, said the decision wasn\u2019t unexpected, but it was still a political move.<\/p>\n
We hope that, rather than engaging in a protracted, expensive and ultimately unsuccessful legal fight, the Department will take this opportunity to negotiate a settlement which will focus the Wire Act and DOJ’s enforcement resources on the right targets \u2013 the unlicensed illegal offshore Internet gambling operators who do not create jobs or tax revenue in the U.S. and do not appropriately protect consumers,” said Ifrah, whose practice is based in Washington.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Others legal experts also weren\u2019t surprised by the appeal.<\/p>\n
\u201cOne question – if this drags out, will the next administration (assuming there is a change over), continue the same fight against the Wire Act?\u201d tweeted Aalok Sharma, a Minneapolis-based sports and entertainment attorney.<\/p>\n
Wire Act History<\/h2>\n
The Wire Act was established in 1961 and signed into law by President Kennedy as an attempt to stop organized crime.<\/p>\n
\n
It states: \u201cWhoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Previous opinions on the law, which has been upheld by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, have stated that covers sports betting.<\/p>\n
However, in his November opinion, Steven A. Engel, an assistant Attorney General in the US Office of Legal Counsel, said the second half of the text \u2013 which begins with \u201cfor the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money\u201d<\/strong> \u2013 applies to any type of wager.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Department of Justice (DOJ) gave official notice in a federal court in New Hampshire Friday that it will appeal a June ruling made by US District Judge Paul Barbadoro in dismissing its new interpretation of the Wire Act. The announcement means the First Circuit Court of Appeals will now consider hearing the case between […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":45,"featured_media":112480,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[60,13699],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
US Justice Department Will Take Wire Act Opinion Case to Appellate Court<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n