Meanwhile, Ferreira claimed AAEC approached two other companies in late January 2001, including Galaxy, about the possibility of working on a bid without LVS.<\/p>\n
\n
LVS was not notified about these talks and Ferreira said his client is fine with this because they occurred shortly after the date LVS alleges the partnership terminated. But they occurred shortly before the date claimed by AAEC, he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
As to why AAEC approached these two other parties, Ferreira said, \u201cWe don\u2019t know. Perhaps only Marshall Hao knows.\u201d<\/p>\n
A final hearing has been scheduled for Feb. 15 to try to establish additional facts before the judge delivers his verdict.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It was Asian American Entertainment Corp (AAEC), and not Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS) that broke up a business relationship between the two parties, a Macau court has heard. It\u2019s a broken partnership that launched what must surely be the biggest breach of contract claim in legal history, with AAEC asking for US$7.5 to US$12 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":199286,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[33810,60],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
LVS Says AAEC Broke Partnership in $7.5B Breach of Contract Case<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n