Parx cited the Lanham Act — also known as the federal Trademark Act of 1946 — in its lawsuit. The Lanham Act is a federal statute of US law that bars activities that infringe on trademarks, trademark dilution, and false advertising.<\/p>\n
\nThe Pennsylvania Crimes Code makes it illegal to intentionally or knowingly make, assemble, set up, maintain, sell, lend, or lease ‘any slot machine’ except as permitted under the Gaming Act, the State Lottery Law, Bingo Law, or the Local Option Small Games of Chance Act,” <\/strong>attorneys representing Parx Casino alleged in the lawsuit.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe lawsuit contends that the Gaming Act defines slot machines as traditional and “skill slot machines,” and “hybrid slot machines.”<\/p>\n
The skill component of POM machines, Parx’s legal team maintains, doesn’t supersede the terminals’ element of chance in determining the outcome.<\/p>\n
“Pennsylvania Skill-branded slot machines are illegal gambling devices, and they are represented to be games of skill when they are not,” the lawsuit continued. “Consideration is required to play, the machines employ random number generators, there is a reward for successful play, and the results of play are not predominantly determined by skill.”<\/p>\n
The lawsuit concluded by alleging that skill games are “essentially the same” as licensed slot machines.<\/p>\n
Costly Decision<\/b><\/h2>\n POM maintains its terminals have been a lifeline for struggling small businesses amid the pandemic. Revenue from the games is split between the host establishment and the manufacturer and distributor.<\/p>\n
\nThey’re not illegal,” <\/strong>said Michael Barley, chief public affairs officer for POM, last month. “Every dollar that’s made, over 92% of it is staying in the commonwealth, staying in small business.”<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nThe machines are not taxed nor regulated to assure players of fair play or a minimum payout, as are casino slots. The Pennsylvania Lottery believes skill games have hurt lottery sales by more than $650 million<\/a> since 2017.<\/p>\nParx’s lawsuit is seeking financial damages from POM.<\/p>\n
“As a direct and proximate result of POM’s wrongful conduct, Parx Casino has suffered and will continue to suffer a great risk of financial losses, permanent irreparable harm, and other continuing harm,” the lawsuit ended.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Parx Casino is the richest gaming property in Pennsylvania. But the Bensalem venue believes it would be generating more revenue if it weren’t for unregulated skill gaming machines operating throughout the Commonwealth. Georgia-based Pace-O-Matic (POM) and its Pennsylvania subsidiary, Miele Amusements, are the leading manufacturer and distributor of the controversial gaming terminals. “Pennsylvania Skill,” as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":237137,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[60,69293],"tags":[83218,82211,82474],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Parx Casino Sues Pennsylvania Skill Gaming Company<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n