{"id":297757,"date":"2023-11-07T21:59:32","date_gmt":"2023-11-08T03:59:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/?p=297757"},"modified":"2023-11-08T11:18:11","modified_gmt":"2023-11-08T17:18:11","slug":"richmond-rejects-casino-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/","title":{"rendered":"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before"},"content":{"rendered":"

Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders.<\/p>\n

\"Richmond
Richmond voters on Tuesday rejected the $562 million Richmond Grand Resort & Casino. It marks the second time in three years that city residents voted down a gaming referendum. (Image: Twitter)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

With all precincts reporting Tuesday night, 58% of Richmonders cast a ballot against the casino referendum, with just 42% in favor.<\/p>\n

The result follows a hard-fought campaign<\/a> after backers of the proposed $562 million casino result faced a narrower defeat of a similar measure in 2021.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Local activist Paul Goldman, who organized the anti-casino campaign, called it a \u201cDavid versus Goliath\u201d battle in which he and his allies were significantly outspent by the companies hoping to build the casino.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a victory for the people of Richmond. It\u2019s not my victory. It\u2019s a victory for the people,\u201d Goldman told Casino.org<\/em> in a phone interview Tuesday evening. \u201cYou can\u2019t build a new city on the old politics of resentment.\u201d<\/p>\n

Casino Developers Concede<\/b><\/h2>\n

The unofficial results released by the state Board of Elections don’t include nearly 18K early voting ballots. But the margin was large enough for casino voters to concede defeat.<\/p>\n

We are proud to have run a community-centered campaign to create more opportunities for residents of this great city to rise into the middle class,\u201d<\/strong> pro-casino group “Richmond Wins Vote Yes” said in a statement Tuesday. \u201cWe are grateful to the thousands of Richmonders who voted for good jobs and a stronger city, especially those in Southside who poured their hearts into this project.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney lamented the loss of the $562-million project, which he and proponents hoped would bring economic development to the city\u2019s south side.<\/p>\n

\u201cI will continue to be a voice for communities that have been historically overlooked and underserved,\u201d Stoney said in a statement. \u201cI will work for more accessible and affordable child care, for good-paying jobs, and for an abundance of opportunities for ALL Richmonders \u2013 no matter their zip code or socioeconomic status.\u201d<\/p>\n

Second Effort, Worse Result<\/b><\/h2>\n

The lopsided result marks the second time Richmond voters have rejected plans to build a casino in the city. In 2021, a similar referendum failed on a much narrower margin, 51%-49%, leading developers and city leaders to mount a second effort this year.<\/p>\n

The project would have been developed by a partnership between Maryland-based media company Urban One and Churchill Downs, the racing and gaming company most famous for hosting the annual Kentucky Derby.<\/p>\n

\n

Support for the project again appeared to be split along racial and geographic lines, with the heavily Black south side, where the casino would be located, showing stronger support than in the city\u2019s whiter northern precincts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Richmond was one of five Virginia cities targeted for casino development as part of a state legislative package adopted in 2020. Four other cities, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Bristol, and Danville, passed their own casino referendums years ago, making Richmond the only locality to reject such a development.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders. With all precincts reporting Tuesday night, 58% of Richmonders cast a ballot against the casino referendum, with just 42% in favor. The result follows […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":102,"featured_media":291409,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,83108,18,86432],"tags":[85381,13598,88121],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nRichmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before - Casino.org<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by Voters in Richmond rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before - Casino.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by Voters in Richmond rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Casino.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Casino.OrgNews\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-08T03:59:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-08T17:18:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nick Juliano\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Casino_Org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Casino_Org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nick Juliano\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/\",\"name\":\"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before - Casino.org\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-08T03:59:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-08T17:18:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d36eacaa6ec6ccb3444785a8820dcfbc\"},\"description\":\"Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by Voters in Richmond rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":700,\"caption\":\"Richmond voters on Tuesday rejected the $562 million Richmond Grand Resort & Casino. It marks the second time in three years that city residents voted down a gaming referendum. (Image: Twitter)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"News\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Election\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/2022-election-coverage\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/\",\"name\":\"Casino.org\",\"description\":\"Latest Casino and Gaming News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d36eacaa6ec6ccb3444785a8820dcfbc\",\"name\":\"Nick Juliano\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/cropped-Untitled-design-10-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/cropped-Untitled-design-10-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Nick Juliano\"},\"description\":\"Nick Juliano covers the regulation of sports betting and casino gaming in the United States. He started as a senior reporter for Casino.org in June 2023 and has covered breaking news regarding legislative and regulatory developments in the Northeast, Midwest, South and Mid-Atlantic. Nick has been a journalist since 2005 and previously wrote for organizations including Politico and the Associated Press. Based in Washington, DC, Nick is an expert on politics and public policy and has covered issues including environmental regulation, energy development and tribal gaming. In his free time, Nick enjoys trying new restaurants and attending concerts around town. He is a fan of all types of games in and out of the casino, from poker to Magic: The Gathering. Contact Nick at nick@casino.org.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/author\/nick-juliano\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before - Casino.org","description":"Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by Voters in Richmond rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before - Casino.org","og_description":"Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by Voters in Richmond rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/","og_site_name":"Casino.org","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Casino.OrgNews","article_published_time":"2023-11-08T03:59:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-08T17:18:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":700,"url":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nick Juliano","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Casino_Org","twitter_site":"@Casino_Org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nick Juliano","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/","url":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/","name":"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before - Casino.org","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg","datePublished":"2023-11-08T03:59:32+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-08T17:18:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d36eacaa6ec6ccb3444785a8820dcfbc"},"description":"Voters in Richmond, Va. rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion-dollar campaign by Voters in Richmond rejected a casino referendum Tuesday by a wider margin than they did two years ago, despite a multimillion dollar campaign by casino developers and support from city leaders.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/F6bSCnZXgAAV6oW.jpg","width":1200,"height":700,"caption":"Richmond voters on Tuesday rejected the $562 million Richmond Grand Resort & Casino. It marks the second time in three years that city residents voted down a gaming referendum. (Image: Twitter)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/richmond-rejects-casino-again\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"News","item":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Election","item":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/2022-election-coverage\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Richmond Rejects Casino Again\u00a0By Wider Margin Than Before"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/","name":"Casino.org","description":"Latest Casino and Gaming News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/d36eacaa6ec6ccb3444785a8820dcfbc","name":"Nick Juliano","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/cropped-Untitled-design-10-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/cropped-Untitled-design-10-96x96.png","caption":"Nick Juliano"},"description":"Nick Juliano covers the regulation of sports betting and casino gaming in the United States. He started as a senior reporter for Casino.org in June 2023 and has covered breaking news regarding legislative and regulatory developments in the Northeast, Midwest, South and Mid-Atlantic. Nick has been a journalist since 2005 and previously wrote for organizations including Politico and the Associated Press. Based in Washington, DC, Nick is an expert on politics and public policy and has covered issues including environmental regulation, energy development and tribal gaming. In his free time, Nick enjoys trying new restaurants and attending concerts around town. He is a fan of all types of games in and out of the casino, from poker to Magic: The Gathering. Contact Nick at nick@casino.org.","url":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/author\/nick-juliano\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297757"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/102"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=297757"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297757\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":297871,"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297757\/revisions\/297871"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291409"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=297757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.casino.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=297757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}