proxy betting<\/a>,” the practice of one player who is physically in a casino taking bets by phone from one who is not, likely has continued at higher rates than one would expect from such a ban. And that, in turn, calls into question the likelihood that money laundering from mainland Chinese players continues, despite the inability of many whales from that country to take money with them when they travel.<\/p>\nNo Trail to Follow<\/h2>\n
It was a year ago that the city’s Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (often referred to by its Portuguese acronym DICJ) placed an official ban on the practice in Macau’s casinos. In a statement toGGRAsia<\/em> last year, the DIJC said that\u00a0the practice of continuing to allow VIP gamblers to use their phones with guidelines had led to “misunderstandings and doubts.” This, in turn, led the Bureau to create the full ban on phone use at gaming tables that went into effect on May 9, 2016.<\/p>\nBut apparently the lucrative nature of proxy betting is not to be so easily abated in the Asian gambling hub. Global Market Advisors Partner Shaun McCamley, who wrote a white paper on the topic, says that large-scale proxy betting operations, which can involve as many as eight tables or more, take under six months to pay for any upfront costs involved. Most attractively, there’s no paper trail back to the absentee bettor, as the bet is placed, and cashed by, the present gambler in the casino (the proxy).<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nDirty Laundry In, Clean Money Out<\/h2>\n
The attraction of this practice for so-called money launderers (typically criminals trying to turn ill-begotten currency into usable and untraceable “clean” currency or goods) is obvious. And where there’s motivation and money, rules will be broken.<\/p>\n
Which may well be why the Macau gaming regulator reported 71 “verbal cautions,” according toGGRAsia<\/em>, for alleged phone use violations. And although that ban was issued beginning last May 9, the majority of those warnings came between January and April of this year, meaning either players are becoming more brazen, or the DIJS is cracking down harder on the violators, or a little of both.<\/p>\n\n
FinCEN Makes Casinos into Moles<\/strong><\/p>\nMacau is not the only area troubled by criminals and money laundering. In the US, FinCEN (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) is the federal watchdog for such activities, and casinos are entirely within its purview.<\/p>\n
In September 2016, FinCEN, along with the Department of Justice, let casinos know that Big Brother is watching them, and they better not try to hide anything.<\/p>\n
\u201cCasinos and card clubs often provide numerous financial services to their customers . . . The DOJ will pursue criminal charges and penalties against . . . [any of these] that willfully violate the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA),\u201d Asset Forfeiture Money Laundering Section Deputy Chief Deborah Connor told those in attendance at the\u00a09th Annual AML Conference in Las Vegas<\/a>\u00a0last year.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"One year after Macau issued a dictum barring the use of cell phones in the Chinese gambling enclave’s casinos, players continue to access their mobile devices while at the city’s tables, gaming regulators recently told Asian gambling news siteGGRAsia. That continued practice means that “proxy betting,” the practice of one player who is physically in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":49293,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,60,18],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Macau Casino Cell Phone Ban Still Ignored by Many Gamblers, Gaming Regulator Says<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n